TBSS Posted May 25, 2005 Report Share Posted May 25, 2005 If you were to buy a Trailblazer SS, which model would you get, and why? And yes, zippy, we know how you're going to vote.... I'd get AWD, more ability to put more power to the ground. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hot rod truck Posted May 25, 2005 Report Share Posted May 25, 2005 You need a second AWD poll option On the street... it's all about the launch>TRACTION Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TBSS Posted May 25, 2005 Author Report Share Posted May 25, 2005 You need a second AWD poll option On the street... it's all about the launch>TRACTION <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I wish I could just change the second option to read "safety/traction" instead of just safety, but no way to modify at this point... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cokedrvrbjw Posted May 25, 2005 Report Share Posted May 25, 2005 AWD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SSLink Posted May 25, 2005 Report Share Posted May 25, 2005 How about AWD with a Xfer case that you can set to disengage automatically to RWD at about 40 MPH? You'd still have the extra weight, but could shed some of the drivetrain loss once you get your a.s moving on a dry street. If it's one or the other, I would want AWD. No trucks and very few cars launch stoplight to stoplight like ours do... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PewterC3 Posted May 25, 2005 Report Share Posted May 25, 2005 How about AWD with a Xfer case that you can set to disengage automatically to RWD at about 40 MPH? You'd still have the extra weight, but could shed some of the drivetrain loss once you get your a.s moving on a dry street. But then it would have to be an electronic unit Me...I'd much rather have full time "mechanical" AWD. IMHO... smokey burnouts only have one place....at the waterbox just before the tree. Everything else is just a waste of rubber. All traction - all the time....that's where it's REALLY at! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
56chevywagon Posted May 25, 2005 Report Share Posted May 25, 2005 Not really safety...TRACTION!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hot rod truck Posted May 25, 2005 Report Share Posted May 25, 2005 How about AWD with a Xfer case that you can set to disengage automatically to RWD at about 40 MPH? You'd still have the extra weight, but could shed some of the drivetrain loss once you get your a.s moving on a dry street. But then it would have to be an electronic unit Me...I'd much rather have full time "mechanical" AWD. IMHO... smokey burnouts only have one place....at the waterbox just before the tree. Everything else is just a waste of rubber. All traction - all the time....that's where it's REALLY at! <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2drTahoe Posted May 25, 2005 Report Share Posted May 25, 2005 What's this "It's all about safety"? This poll is tainted from the start It's all about TRACTION! Because it's an SUV, AWD seems more fitting for it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peerson Posted May 25, 2005 Report Share Posted May 25, 2005 AWD for me! T Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maximus Posted May 25, 2005 Report Share Posted May 25, 2005 I love the traction AWD gets!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChevySSandChevy8.1 Posted May 25, 2005 Report Share Posted May 25, 2005 Main reason I bought an SS instead of other rwd trucks. Also its great in winter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HOLSTEIN Posted May 26, 2005 Report Share Posted May 26, 2005 RWD already have a AWD vehicle.........sss.....ha ha ha ha Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Posi12Bolt Posted May 27, 2005 Report Share Posted May 27, 2005 BURNOUTS ARE GREAT!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.