11SECSS Posted September 28, 2005 Report Share Posted September 28, 2005 Anyone have the results from the track on these things I dont care about dyno #'s track numbers are better proof....also any pics of it installed on the SSS's Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fox_forma Posted September 28, 2005 Report Share Posted September 28, 2005 here ya go......there is a little indent on the filter, not sure what its from Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
11SECSS Posted September 29, 2005 Author Report Share Posted September 29, 2005 That looks bad ass and will look even better under my hood with the panels I just had painted.....I think it will help with my track times Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fox_forma Posted September 29, 2005 Report Share Posted September 29, 2005 you'll like it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
11SECSS Posted October 3, 2005 Author Report Share Posted October 3, 2005 Just FYI I went to the track after installing the kit with no other mods I went .14 tenth faster so I give this CAI a since track result are better the dyno. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
haulin79 Posted October 5, 2005 Report Share Posted October 5, 2005 Just FYI I went to the track after installing the kit with no other mods I went .14 tenth faster so I give this CAI a since track result are better the dyno. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Track results are no better or worse than dyno results, what IS important is a consistent test procedure and keeping variables to an absolute minimum. VARIABLES (please add to the list if you can think of more): Dyno Variables: 1. Coolant temp 2. Intake temp 3. Oil temp 4. Tire temp 5. Tire Pressure 6. Atmo altitude, temp and humidity 7. Tranny temp 8. Measurement System error (rpm and torque) Track Variables 1. Coolant temp 2. Intake temp 3. Oil temp 4. Tire temp 5. Tire Pressure 6. Atmo altitude, temp and humidity 7. Tranny Temp 8. Track temp 9. Launch RPM 10. Shift RPM 1st to 2nd gear 11. Shift RPM 2nd to 3rd gear 12. Wind speed 13. Wind direction 14. Steering Corrections 15. Measurement System error (Time and Speed) Items 1 to 7 are the same in each list. Using track times has nearly twice as many test variables as dyno testing. But like I said, if each are done consistently with an eye towards error analysis and statistical repeatability, then both are valid testing methods for making tuning decisions. I love the track but with a list like that above I see no reason why the track is less prone to error. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.