packjh Posted May 10, 2009 Report Share Posted May 10, 2009 hmmm, i was figuring the first wreck would have been because the driver hit somebody not the other way around. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jond983 Posted May 10, 2009 Report Share Posted May 10, 2009 i wasnt a huge camaro fan until i saw one in person yesterday and it's super nice..but if that were me i wouldn't know how to feel to be honest Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BRAD Posted May 10, 2009 Report Share Posted May 10, 2009 Oh hell, that'll buff out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Turbocoop Posted May 10, 2009 Report Share Posted May 10, 2009 wow that really sucks, I dont know what Id do it that happened to me Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
silverado_ss_04 Posted May 10, 2009 Report Share Posted May 10, 2009 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SS Silv Posted May 10, 2009 Report Share Posted May 10, 2009 Either GM did a shit job on building the rear-end of the car, or it was rear-ended by a vehicle going 100mph. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
QuixSilver Posted May 10, 2009 Report Share Posted May 10, 2009 WOW WOOW... that sux. I just saw a new camaro for the first time on the street here in Houston yesterday, a red SS with black stripes it was SWEEEEET!! I heard they just released 50 for sale here in Houston in the past week or so. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eddie Posted May 11, 2009 Report Share Posted May 11, 2009 It should be legal to choke out the kid that did that and tell his parents to try again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jaymz Posted May 11, 2009 Report Share Posted May 11, 2009 Either GM did a shit job on building the rear-end of the car, or it was rear-ended by a vehicle going 100mph. that camaro looks horrible.. Makes you wonder what it would look like after a roll over- or your typical front end crash.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SS Silv Posted May 11, 2009 Report Share Posted May 11, 2009 (edited) that camaro looks horrible.. Makes you wonder what it would look like after a roll over- or your typical front end crash.. I have never seen a car "wrinkle" like that. I hate to "dog" a GM product, but they ****ed that car up. I would rather purchase a challenger, they look a lot better. Edited May 11, 2009 by SS Silv (see edit history) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fireman31 Posted May 11, 2009 Report Share Posted May 11, 2009 Either GM did a shit job on building the rear-end of the car, or it was rear-ended by a vehicle going 100mph. that camaro looks horrible.. Makes you wonder what it would look like after a roll over- or your typical front end crash.. I have never seen a car "wrinkle" like that. I hate to "dog" a GM product, but they ****ed that car up. I would rather purchase a challenger, they look a lot better. Take a look at those pics again, that car got slammed really hard, the trunk lid is in the back seat. That Camaro was rear ended at 40+ MPH to have damage that extensive. Most newer cars wrinkle like that for a reason, to absorb impact, I see it all the time. They are called crumple zones, the damage is extensive, but the the occupants of the vehicle are safer and less likely to be injured because of it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SS Silv Posted May 11, 2009 Report Share Posted May 11, 2009 (edited) Take a look at those pics again, that car got slammed really hard, the trunk lid is in the back seat. That Camaro was rear ended at 40+ MPH to have damage that extensive. Most newer cars wrinkle like that for a reason, to absorb impact, I see it all the time. They are called crumple zones, the damage is extensive, but the the occupants of the vehicle are safer and less likely to be injured because of it. Makes 'kinda' sense, but I guess the people in the back seat are ****ed. Edited May 11, 2009 by SS Silv (see edit history) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SS-Red Posted May 11, 2009 Report Share Posted May 11, 2009 (edited) Thats not right Edited May 11, 2009 by SS-Red (see edit history) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jesse 05ss Posted May 11, 2009 Report Share Posted May 11, 2009 Take a look at those pics again, that car got slammed really hard, the trunk lid is in the back seat. That Camaro was rear ended at 40+ MPH to have damage that extensive. Most newer cars wrinkle like that for a reason, to absorb impact, I see it all the time. They are called crumple zones, the damage is extensive, but the the occupants of the vehicle are safer and less likely to be injured because of it. Ya I seen an 08 silverado 2500 HD the other day that rolled and the passenger would not have been able to crawl out the side window it was so smashed and they both were treated and released the same day. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dmf21209 Posted May 11, 2009 Report Share Posted May 11, 2009 Makes 'kinda' sense, but I guess the people in the back seat are ****ed. Who would have backseat passengers in a new camaro? I know I wouldnt This is something that would happen to me, so I can understand how the guy feels lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.