orlando Posted November 19, 2005 Author Report Share Posted November 19, 2005 I don't know if you noticed But, it will be harder to work on the engine as it's push in like the engines on vans let's try to put a radix on it http://www.sportruck.com/news/2007-cadillac-escalade/10.jpg <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Ya people may have to go with a turbo setup. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SSSTony Posted November 19, 2005 Report Share Posted November 19, 2005 Found out the 6.2 is only going in the vette with 400hp. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> The vette already has 400hp - with *only* 6.0. IMO it's too early to get any definitive info. Don't get me wrong, I still love reading this stuff though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SSSTony Posted November 24, 2005 Report Share Posted November 24, 2005 "... a new 6.2L all-aluminum V-8 engine with variable valve timing technology delivering 403 horsepower and 417 lb-ft of torque" 2007 Cadillac Escalade http://www.sportruck.com/news/2007-cadilla...Information.htm <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Hmmm...which would be the better tuner/mod engine?...The LS2 coming in the TBSS or the new 6.2? Any opinions? I'll guess the LS2 for awhile, being that it's been out a year or two? Just wondering which one would be cheaper/easier to get modest gains from? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zippy Posted November 26, 2005 Report Share Posted November 26, 2005 the 6.2L should just be a bigger version of the LS2. the mods should interchange. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlackVortecHO Posted December 12, 2005 Report Share Posted December 12, 2005 FYI litres x 60 = cubic inches Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ssjonathan Posted December 12, 2005 Report Share Posted December 12, 2005 FYI litres x 60 = cubic inches <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I don't think there is a straight conversion factor..it is definately a decimal factor maybe somehting between 60.5 and 61.5....????? 5.7 x 61.4= 350 6.0 x 60.7 = 364 they all play out a little bit differently...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
misterp Posted December 12, 2005 Report Share Posted December 12, 2005 the 6.2L should just be a bigger version of the LS2. the mods should interchange. Maybe; but tuning will take on a whole new meaning when you also have to program the VVT and DOD systems. Expect all new tuning software, these engines may be like the Dodge Hemi (lack of available tuning software). Mr. P. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stealth03ss Posted December 12, 2005 Report Share Posted December 12, 2005 Maybe; but tuning will take on a whole new meaning when you also have to program the VVT and DOD systems. Expect all new tuning software, these engines may be like the Dodge Hemi (lack of available tuning software). Mr. P. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I hate to say it but this may be the truth... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PladdPezzPunk Posted December 12, 2005 Report Share Posted December 12, 2005 actuall to be techinical, 1 litre is equal to 61.02376 cubic inches. all in all though, our engines are not actually 6.0 litres. it is the same with the old ford mustangs. the notorious 5.0 is actually a 4.9488 litre engine. good old physics i guess i did learn something in collage. our engines are actually 5.9648 litres and the 6.2 is actually 6.1615 if the 376 number is correct. zippy's bore and stroke calculation is actually the best way to decifer what an engine actually is. that would be pi multiplied by radius squared multplied by stroke. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoolBlueSS Posted December 14, 2005 Report Share Posted December 14, 2005 check the GMC site...the '07 Yukon Denali gets the 6.2 and 380hp/415tq....don't EVER ask a Salesmen <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Salesmen don't know jack. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jchitwo Posted December 14, 2005 Report Share Posted December 14, 2005 I don't know if you noticed But, it will be harder to work on the engine as it's push in like the engines on vans let's try to put a radix on it http://www.sportruck.com/news/2007-cadillac-escalade/10.jpg <{POST_SNAPBACK}> That's really not much different than my 05' with the factory e fans, it just doesn't look like it sticks out as much, but mabey the picture is decieving??? and I agree, I haven't ever been impressed by any vehicle salesperson on the knowledge of the products their selling. Most of them seem to have limited or no idea how a vehilce works or what it really does. much less what's coming out next....ok I'm done ranting.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RevolutionRaceWorks Posted December 24, 2005 Report Share Posted December 24, 2005 Salesmen crack me up.. some of them. Some do know their stuff but.. The VVT thing is very intresting.. I can't wait to see what turns up and out.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
383ss Posted December 27, 2005 Report Share Posted December 27, 2005 the 6.2L should just be a bigger version of the LS2. the mods should interchange. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> the internals will interchange, but the heads and intake are different. they use a square port instead of the rectangular of the LS2. the head design is completely new. its a lot like the LS7 head. the front cover is also different since the VVT is basically extended out from the camshaft. therefore the water pump is also different. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
timz06 Posted January 2, 2006 Report Share Posted January 2, 2006 1 liter = 1000 cc's (cm^3)----2.54 cm = 1 inch 6.0 L x 1000 cm^3/1 L X ((1 in )^3)/((2.54 cm))^3 = in^3 note 2.54 ^3 = 16.387 so 6 * 1000 / 16.387 = 366.14 cu in so 61.024 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zippy Posted January 2, 2006 Report Share Posted January 2, 2006 1 liter = 1000 cc's (cm^3)----2.54 cm = 1 inch 6.0 L x 1000 cm^3/1 L X ((1 in )^3)/((2.54 cm))^3 = in^3 note 2.54 ^3 = 16.387 so 6 * 1000 / 16.387 = 366.14 cu in so 61.024 this formula would work if something work exactly to the 1000cc's. i use the bore-stroke formula to figure out cubic inches. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.