zippy Posted January 7, 2006 Report Share Posted January 7, 2006 I'm in the 27-29 area for timing and no to little KR. I have been doing alot of logs and thats about where i am at also. what is you dynamic air per cylinder at roughly? this is a pic from on of my logs with .93 dynamic air per cylinder at 6k rpm. this was roughing in some tuning. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mwalls54 Posted January 7, 2006 Report Share Posted January 7, 2006 I just did a log and it was 1.13 at about 6300 or so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TurbochargedBerserker Posted January 7, 2006 Report Share Posted January 7, 2006 Forget the SSR mani -- otherwise known as the LS2 truck. It is the same manifold as our truck mani with an opened up throttle neck to 90mm. I looked into this (and even had the SSR 90mm setup on order) as did BigTex and Jeff. AFAIK the LS2 car manifold didn't dyno as well as the LS6 (but its been a while... a year about). Not to mention the custom parts you need... Here's something to consider: Parish made 1000+ rear wheel horsepower with that truck manifold. I made my numbers with it as well. Yah, it's different for boosted motors, and Ben definitely will see a benefit from stepping up to a bigger manifold. I'm not sure how much a cam&heads 6.0L needs 90mm though. Zippy bumped the dyno thread on the manifolds, I think. That has a good comparo of the LS6 vs the truck vs FAST 78mm as I recall. Not much difference there. You guys should just slap some turbos on and keep the truck manifolds!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BenKey Posted January 7, 2006 Report Share Posted January 7, 2006 I shift at 6000 right now. Mine are at .89. I haven't done any tuning on my truck since September. Waiting to get my headers/exhaust all hooked up before I try for more. It runs pretty good right now, just haven't pushed it too much - yet. Why do you ask, Zippy? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BenKey Posted January 7, 2006 Report Share Posted January 7, 2006 You guys should just slap some turbos on and keep the truck manifolds!! <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I like your logic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zippy Posted January 8, 2006 Report Share Posted January 8, 2006 i was just asking because i didn't get enough time playing with matt's new setup and i know his and yours is similar. getting 1.13 per cylinder is outstanding. that certainly shows the difference in how well the stock cylinder heads resist knock compared to the new heads. i like your idea erik, high compression and boost just screems for methanol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
matt rem Posted January 8, 2006 Author Report Share Posted January 8, 2006 You guys should just slap some turbos on and keep the truck manifolds!! <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I think you might be rite Erik, Nice to see you are back. I think the cam I got from Moregrip might have been yours? I think your name is on the box. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BenKey Posted January 8, 2006 Report Share Posted January 8, 2006 Ben that is pretty good, Isn't that motor almost 11:1 c/r? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I'm at 11.3:1CR. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krambo Posted January 8, 2006 Report Share Posted January 8, 2006 Matt...did you get a dyno date yet? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
matt rem Posted January 8, 2006 Author Report Share Posted January 8, 2006 No I am thinking this week or next, work is alittle nuts rite now so its hard to get away for a day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
matt rem Posted January 8, 2006 Author Report Share Posted January 8, 2006 Zippy I am around 25* it was at 28* and we where seeing some KR. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mwalls54 Posted January 9, 2006 Report Share Posted January 9, 2006 i was just asking because i didn't get enough time playing with matt's new setup and i know his and yours is similar. getting 1.13 per cylinder is outstanding. that certainly shows the difference in how well the stock cylinder heads resist knock compared to the new heads. i like your idea erik, high compression and boost just screems for methanol. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I went back and looked at my logs and i have alot of wot runs that are in the 1.55 range and even have one that went up to 2.08 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zippy Posted January 9, 2006 Report Share Posted January 9, 2006 i was just asking because i didn't get enough time playing with matt's new setup and i know his and yours is similar. getting 1.13 per cylinder is outstanding. that certainly shows the difference in how well the stock cylinder heads resist knock compared to the new heads. i like your idea erik, high compression and boost just screems for methanol. I went back and looked at my logs and i have alot of wot runs that are in the 1.55 range and even have one that went up to 2.08 i've never seen numbers that high. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TurbochargedBerserker Posted January 9, 2006 Report Share Posted January 9, 2006 I think you might be rite Erik, Nice to see you are back. I think the cam I got from Moregrip might have been yours? I think your name is on the box. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Ah haha I wonder what Grippy is using then. That was a 220ish? I think Matt got the 230/236.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
matt rem Posted January 9, 2006 Author Report Share Posted January 9, 2006 I think you might be rite Erik, Nice to see you are back. I think the cam I got from Moregrip might have been yours? I think your name is on the box. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Ah haha I wonder what Grippy is using then. That was a 220ish? I think Matt got the 230/236.. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> 220/224 581/581 on a 115lsa Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.