SS_bnoon_SS Posted July 7, 2006 Report Share Posted July 7, 2006 just wasn't as good in 1964! <{POST_SNAPBACK}> The part that matters... The 'cudes that really mattered didn't happen until much later. The early ones were more focused on being cheap to own over being fun to drive instead of combining the two. Not that I'd kick an early one out of my driveway today though!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dannyc_2006_SS Posted July 7, 2006 Report Share Posted July 7, 2006 Does any1 know or have an idea of what the pricing will/could be like for the Challenger? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redimpss5 Posted July 11, 2006 Report Share Posted July 11, 2006 Drool... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorCalSS Posted July 11, 2006 Author Report Share Posted July 11, 2006 Does any1 know or have an idea of what the pricing will/could be like for the Challenger? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> in order for the Challenger to stay competitive they're gonna have to stay in the same price range for today's Mustang and the "soon to come" Camaro, IMO. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xero Posted July 11, 2006 Report Share Posted July 11, 2006 im sorry, but the new mustang, camaro, callenger, and all the rest. they all look like large plastic hot wheels. They dont look real to me, i dont know what it is about it. I just doubt the realness of these cars, they all look plasticy fake Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.