detjoe Posted August 9, 2006 Report Share Posted August 9, 2006 When you say you looked for more power under the curve, I assume you mean part throttle??? Usually when I'm doing some dyno tuning I go from about 2500-XXXX and anything under that curve are numbers I've already beaten. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> so how much have you dyno'd the MP112? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BenKey Posted August 9, 2006 Report Share Posted August 9, 2006 When you say you looked for more power under the curve, I assume you mean part throttle??? Usually when I'm doing some dyno tuning I go from about 2500-XXXX and anything under that curve are numbers I've already beaten. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> so how much have you dyno'd the MP112? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Same question I had Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zippy Posted August 9, 2006 Report Share Posted August 9, 2006 When you say you looked for more power under the curve, I assume you mean part throttle??? Usually when I'm doing some dyno tuning I go from about 2500-XXXX and anything under that curve are numbers I've already beaten. so how much have you dyno'd the MP112? Same question I had Have not tuned a Radix truck on a dyno other than Fuel Slut's when he had fueling problems. That has nothing to do with my question of under the curve. If I look at a dyno sheet, I see a torque curve and a horsepower curve. I'm not concerned about the numbers under either curve. HP peak and TQ peak to not indicate a curve. The curve starts from the point where wide open throttle is achieved to when you let off the throttle. I will say on the other hand though, anytime you can gain hp like that just in programming makes for a much better driving truck. Are you going to run at the track again with it like this Grippy? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moregrip Posted August 10, 2006 Author Report Share Posted August 10, 2006 (edited) Are you going to run at the track again with it like this Grippy? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Negative, this was for baseline MP112 #'s only, next step is the MP122HH swap/calibration to show the differences between the two systems Edited August 10, 2006 by moregrip (see edit history) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zippy Posted August 11, 2006 Report Share Posted August 11, 2006 Are you going to run at the track again with it like this Grippy? Negative, this was for baseline MP112 #'s only, next step is the MP122HH swap/calibration to show the differences between the two systems Very cool. I've been waiting like a kid at Christmas for those numbers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krambo Posted August 11, 2006 Report Share Posted August 11, 2006 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moregrip Posted August 13, 2006 Author Report Share Posted August 13, 2006 thanks guys, as soon as it hits my doorstep it will be going on. Anyone know where I can get some 60lb high impedence injectors on sale or a good deal? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moregrip Posted August 15, 2006 Author Report Share Posted August 15, 2006 forgot I had these on my desktop, here's one of the runs, IAT's between 118-122 at the end of a run was consistent all day, dyno cell temp was mid-high 80's Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BenKey Posted August 15, 2006 Report Share Posted August 15, 2006 The highest at the MAF was 53lb/min? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krambo Posted August 16, 2006 Report Share Posted August 16, 2006 53 does seem a little low Ben. Do you have any concerns running your AFR at 13.0? Have you tried a little fatter? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moregrip Posted August 17, 2006 Author Report Share Posted August 17, 2006 (edited) Do you have any concerns running your AFR at 13.0? Have you tried a little fatter? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I was wondering if anyone would ask me about the AFR.....At this point I don't have any concerns about the 13.0 AFR for two reasons; one, we are seeing zero KR, and two, it is very temporary. We simply ran out of injector and believe there is more power to be had with the current setup with more fuel. I am in the process of acquiring 60lb high impedence injectors. The 6.0L LQ4 in a truck seems to be especially thirsty compared to a 6.0L LS2 in a car. good question Edited August 17, 2006 by moregrip (see edit history) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.