Jump to content

What do you guys think of this little car?


misterp

Recommended Posts

Red Line Specifications:

0-60 mph (0-96 km/h): 5.5 seconds

0-100 mph (0-160 km/h): 14.7 seconds

5-60 mph (8-96 km/h): 5.9 seconds

1/4 mile: 13.9 seconds @ 100 mph

Top speed: 141 mph

70-0 mph braking: 168 ft

300 ft skidpad: 0.90 g

EPA fuel economy: 22 mpg city/31 highway

 

kinda makes you think twice about a saturn.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

cool looking car and quick for a 4 pot....

we had a tour of the Saturn factory in 2004 i recommend it to anyone give you an insight to how cars are built very informative friendly tour guides too each employee get the opportunity to become tour guide for a while so its real hands on info...

 

and if i was slimmer or the Saturn's were bigger i'd probably have one as a second car

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Red Line Specifications:

0-60 mph (0-96 km/h): 5.5 seconds

0-100 mph (0-160 km/h): 14.7 seconds

5-60 mph (8-96 km/h): 5.9 seconds

1/4 mile: 13.9 seconds @ 100 mph

Top speed: 141 mph

70-0 mph braking: 168 ft

300 ft skidpad: 0.90 g

EPA fuel economy: 22 mpg city/31 highway

 

kinda makes you think twice about a saturn.

 

 

where ever you got that from doesent make much sense. it says 0-100mph 13.9 and also 0-100mph 14.7??? i know the 1/4 mile one i close. but i have posted about this car before my lady loves it but for the money we coul dget her a tbss , cool car though. defiantly like the turbo. they shoul dbe upping the hp in the next year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Red Line Specifications:

0-60 mph (0-96 km/h): 5.5 seconds

0-100 mph (0-160 km/h): 14.7 seconds

5-60 mph (8-96 km/h): 5.9 seconds

1/4 mile: 13.9 seconds @ 100 mph

Top speed: 141 mph

70-0 mph braking: 168 ft

300 ft skidpad: 0.90 g

EPA fuel economy: 22 mpg city/31 highway

 

kinda makes you think twice about a saturn.

 

 

where ever you got that from doesent make much sense. it says 0-100mph 13.9 and also 0-100mph 14.7??? i know the 1/4 mile one i close. but i have posted about this car before my lady loves it but for the money we coul dget her a tbss , cool car though. defiantly like the turbo. they shoul dbe upping the hp in the next year.

june 2006 car and driver. i wasn't the one that tested it. it does sound a little bogus though.

Edited by wody (see edit history)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also, you can buy a C5 drop top for less...has more room, more power, etc. C5's have power tops, Skyline/solstice's do not. Also, the only thing that angers me about these cars is the amount manufactured. I dont want to pay a $10k premium to have one. I've seen them going for as much as $40k...rediculous. If they are that popular, teh company should increase production to deliver at teh price point they initially set and advertised on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the Saturn Sky is a much better looking car than the Solstice.

 

I agree... but like solstice too except the front view

kinda makes you think twice about a saturn.

:withstupid: Pretty close to my Uncles WRX numbers and that thing is fun though... are the saturns awd?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What's the point of having a sports car in a automatic :confused: It's like the Corvette guy's when they try to sell there auto's. They have a heck of a time finding the right buyer. Sport cars typically are 2nd cars, so why not have fun with the stick. Kinda boring if you ask me, to drive drive a small sporty car in a auto IMO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...