funceca88 Posted July 7, 2009 Report Share Posted July 7, 2009 (edited) i most likely will puke!!!!!!!!!!! i will never drive a bright red vehicle. no offense. lol maybe the black is so fast that i cant get a picture of it.??? Edited July 7, 2009 by Vidalss (see edit history) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BOB47 Posted July 7, 2009 Report Share Posted July 7, 2009 Bits are bits, either they write correctly or they write corrupted. And a corrupted write would show as garbage, not loss of sharpness. Better cards do affect how fast the picture can be saved to the card, and as a result, affect the pace of rapid fire shots. You are correct. "Sharper" was a bad choice of words. What I was trying to say is that a faster card can affect your effective shutter speed therefore giving more chance for motion to affect the apparent sharpness of the shot. Old Kodachrome film records images with silver halides embedded in the emulsion of the film. No matter what speed you shoot at you have the same number of silver halides exposed but they can record as not sharp because of camera movement. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big O Posted July 8, 2009 Report Share Posted July 8, 2009 What part of the picture are you not happy with? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mcmahan Posted July 8, 2009 Report Share Posted July 8, 2009 pic looks fine to me Rob!!!!!!! truck looks good btw Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slammedbowtie Posted July 8, 2009 Author Report Share Posted July 8, 2009 (edited) ill post another example. my iso IS set to hi. i thought that would make the picture sharper? how did you get all that info on my pic? stalker lol. this pic in corel photo 6 looks like hell. it looks like a bunch of pixels put together. on here it looks pretty decent but i still think the camara has potential to take better pics. i am holding pretty darn steady. like i said i know someone that had one about a year ago and took great clear pics, i was amazed, and im def disappointed with the quality i have been getting. it has to be the settings but in the 10000 page manual i cant find anything to help me. thanks for the replies Edited July 8, 2009 by slammedbowtie (see edit history) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.